Augmented anterior maxillary bone ridge using ptfe with 1:1 autogenous bone and xenograft mixture
Patients of both groups will be subjected to CBCT (diagnostic for upper arch).
Intra operative procedures (for both groups) followed by CBCT will be taken for every patient.
Local anesthesia will be given to the patient.
Scrubbing and draping of the patient will be carried out in a standard fashion for intra oral procedures.
intervention:
Flap will be done.
In the group: bone decortication will be done using surgical round bur, autogenous bone will be harvested by trephine bur ,mixed 1:1 with anorganic bovine bone derived mineral mineral will be packed then covered at the defected area by a ptfe membrane which will be stabilized by tacks.

Local anesthesia will be given to the patient. intervention:
Flap will be done.
In the group: bone decortication will be done using surgical round bur, autogenous bone will be harvested by trephine bur ,mixed 1:1 with anorganic bovine bone derived mineral mineral will be packed then covered at the defected area by a native collagen membrane which will be stabilized by tacks.

Missing Maxillary Anterior Teeth

• human Patients with atrophied anterior maxillary ridge area.

intra oral procedures.
Flap will be done.
In the study group: bone decortication will be done using surgical round bur, autogenous bone will be harvested by trephine bur ,mixed 1:1 with anorganic bovine bone derived mineral mineral will be packed then covered at the defected area by a native collagen membrane which will be stabilized by tacks.
In the control group: : bone decortication will be done using surgical round bur, autogenous bone will be harvested by trephine bur ,mixed 1:1 with anorganic bovine bone derived mineral and packed at the defected area then covered by a titanium reinforced polytetraflouroethelene membrane which will be stabilized by tacks.
The site will then be copiously irrigated with saline in preparation for closure.
The flap will then be closed using interrupted 4/0 resorbable sutures.

guided bone regenerations

Cairo Univeristy

Poly Tetra Fluro Ethylene vs Native Collagen Membrane for Gbr in Anterior Maxilla

Assessment Of Poly Tetra Fluro Ethylene Membrane Versus Native Collagen Membrane With Guided Bone Regeneration In Atrophic Anterior Maxilla Using (1:1) Of Autogenous Bone And Xenograft Mixture (Randomized Clinical Trial)

bassam ahmed abd elhameed alkholi

principle investigator (doctor)

Cairo University

each patient will be given a code by researcher and observer will be blind to which group this case belong

Root Canal Treatment with hand instruments:Root canal treatment was done with instrumentation using manual K files.

Root canal treatment with Protaper instruments:Root canal treatment was done using ProTaper rotary files S1, S2, F1, and F2.

Root canal treatment with hybrid instrumentation:Root canal treatment was carried out using ProTaper and Hyflex CM files.

Apical Periodontitis

Root canal treatment was performed with K files.

Root Canal Treatment with hand instruments

Root canals were enlarged with S1 S2 F1F2 F2 Protaper instruments

Root canal treatment with Protaper instruments

Root canal were enlarged with combination of a combination of ProTaper Universal instruments to shape the coronal and middle thirds and Hyflex CM to prepare the apical third

Root canal treatment with hybrid instrumentation

Effect of Different Instrumentation Technique on Endodontic Outcome

Effect of Different Instrumentation Technique on Outcome of Primary Non Surgical Endodontic Treatment

Periapical radiolucency was graded as Periapical Index (PAI) and scores less than 3 were grded as success

Absence of pain tenderness sinus or swelling was graded as clinical success

Pain intensity before and after treatment was recorded using 0-100 mm VAS scale

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

We sequentially padded P-cell, Ethylene Vinyl Acetate, and Multiform on the 9-mm thick plastazote under daily walking compression to make dynamic impression insole.

The custom molded insole was made by sequentially padded Multiform, P-cell, EVA, and cork on the positive plaster cast impressed by an impression box while holding the subtalar joint at a neutral position.

We used 9-mm flat Plastazote as an insole

We used 7-mm flat Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) as an insole

Metatarsalgia

We sequentially padded (1)a 6.5-mm thick P-cell (21 Shore A hardness, Acor orthopedic Inc. Cleveland, Ohio, USA), and (2)a piece of metatarsal pad and arch support made of Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) (40 Shore A hardness, Schein orthopadie service KG. Remscheid, Germany) to the bottom of the impressed 9-mm thick plastazote (15 Shore A hardness, Schein orthopadie service KG. Remscheid, Germany) with double-sided adhesive tape in the forefoot region and just proximal to the first, second, and third metatarsal head region. We additionally padded a 2-mm thick Multiform (30 Shore A hardness, Schein orthopadie service KG. Remscheid, Germany) on the top of the impressed insole with double-sided adhesive tape.

Dynamic impression insole

The custom molded insole was made by sequentially padded Multiform (30 Shore A hardness, Schein orthopadie service KG. Remscheid, Germany), P-cell (21 Shore A hardness, Acor orthopedic Inc. Cleveland, Ohio, USA), Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA)(40 Shore A hardness, Schein orthopadie service KG. Remscheid, Germany), and cork (50 Shore A hardness, Schein orthopadie service KG. Remscheid, Germany) on the positive plaster cast impressed by an impression box while holding the subtalar joint at a neutral position.

Custom molded insole

We used 9-mm flat Plastazote(15 Shore A hardness, Schein orthopadie service KG. Remscheid, Germany) as an insole

9-mm uncompressed Plastazote

We used 7-mm flat Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) (40 Shore A hardness, Schein orthopadie service KG. Remscheid, Germany) as an insole

7-mm Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA)

Taipei VGH

The Analysis and Applications of Dynamic Impression Insole

The Effect of Dynamic Impression Insoles on Plantar Pressure and Pain in Persons With Metatarsal Pain

We measure peak pressure (in unit of kPa) under forefoot, midfoot, and rearfoot when using different kinds of insoles by Pedar-X mobile in-shoe system (Novel gmbh, Munich, Germany), and data were processed with the Novel-Win Multimask analysis software (Novel gmbh, Munich, Germany) after using dynamic impression insole for four weeks.

We measure pain levels when using different kinds of insoles by Visual Analog Scales after using dynamic impression insole for four weeks.

ethylene/atrofi

Poly Tetra Fluro Ethylene vs Native Collagen Membrane for Gbr in Anterior Maxilla

Effect of Different Instrumentation Technique on Endodontic Outcome

The Analysis and Applications of Dynamic Impression Insole

Den mest kompletta databasen med medicinska örter som stöds av vetenskapen