Turkish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Irish Medical Journal 2003-Oct

A prospective analysis of inpatient consultations to a gastroenterology service.

Sadece kayıtlı kullanıcılar makaleleri çevirebilir
Giriş yapmak kayıt olmak
Bağlantı panoya kaydedilir
S Bohra
M F Byrne
D Manning
C Smyth
S E Patchett
F E Murray

Anahtar kelimeler

Öz

The provision of a formal consultation service for inpatients between subspecialists is little studied. We prospectively surveyed the pattern of inpatient consultations from hospital-based generalists and surgeons to the gastroenterology (GI) service for inpatients in a large urban teaching hospital over a 5 month period. There are two GI consultants/attendings and five GI registrars/fellows on the service. A formal consultation is made by the requesting team to the GI service using the hospital computer network. All referrals over a 5 month period were prospectively analysed. 242 consecutive inpatient referrals were sent to the GI service over 5 months. Average age was 56 years, 48.8% males. 32 consultants/attendings from other disciplines sent referrals. Most patients were seen within one working day. Urgent referrals were seen without delay. The commonest reasons for referral were abdominal pain (15.8%), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion (13.6%), diarrhoea (12.8%), abnormal liver blood tests (10%), nausea and vomiting (8.2%), anaemia (6.2%), and melaena (4.9%). Iatrogenic diseases accounted for 6.2% of consultations. Ongoing patient care was assumed by the GI team in 9.5% of referrals. 15.3% required a second consultation visit before discharge. 22.7% of referrals were followed in the GI outpatients' clinic after discharge. 51.2% underwent an endoscopic procedure. 13.6% of referrals were for PEG tube insertion. A quarter of these were considered unsuitable for immediate PEG tube insertion. Subspecialty consultation provides an expert opinion, encourages discussion and learning, and improves patient care. In our experience, the provision of specialist advice and reassurance often speeded up a patient's work-up and expedited discharge. However, evaluating referral patients and subsequently providing ongoing inpatient and outpatient care and provision of endoscopy for these referrals contributes significantly to the workload of the GI service.

Facebook sayfamıza katılın

Bilim tarafından desteklenen en eksiksiz şifalı otlar veritabanı

  • 55 dilde çalışır
  • Bilim destekli bitkisel kürler
  • Görüntüye göre bitki tanıma
  • Etkileşimli GPS haritası - bölgedeki bitkileri etiketleyin (yakında)
  • Aramanızla ilgili bilimsel yayınları okuyun
  • Şifalı bitkileri etkilerine göre arayın
  • İlgi alanlarınızı düzenleyin ve haber araştırmaları, klinik denemeler ve patentlerle güncel kalın

Bir belirti veya hastalık yazın ve yardımcı olabilecek bitkiler hakkında bilgi edinin, bir bitki yazın ve karşı kullanıldığı hastalıkları ve semptomları görün.
* Tüm bilgiler yayınlanmış bilimsel araştırmalara dayanmaktadır

Google Play badgeApp Store badge