Turkish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Revista Argentina de Microbiologia 1993

[Diagnosis of entero-invasive Escherichia coli associated with diarrhea].

Sadece kayıtlı kullanıcılar makaleleri çevirebilir
Giriş yapmak kayıt olmak
Bağlantı panoya kaydedilir
I Chinen
M Rivas
M I Caffer
R O Cinto
N Binsztein

Anahtar kelimeler

Öz

Sixteen Escherichia coli strains isolated from diarrhea patients, characterized as enteroinvasive (EIEC) by the keratoconjunctivitis test (Sereny test), and 15 non-EIEC strains, were studied. The aim of this study was to establish a possible correlation between the Sereny test and several other tests as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and biochemical markers, which are more easily accessible to general practice laboratories. Strains were assayed for the virulence marker antigen (the outer membrane proteins) by direct ELISA, biochemical tests, antimicrobial susceptibility profile and serotyping. Mean optical density (OD) values in the ELISA were 2.018 +/- 0.336 for EIEC strains, and 0.569 +/- 0.283 for non-EIEC strains. Difference between the OD values of the two groups was found to be significant at p < 0.01 by the one-tailed Student's test. One (6.2%) of the 16 Sereny test-positive strains was negative by ELISA. Considered as a group, the EIEC strains are rather heterogeneous in their biochemical characteristics. Lysine decarboxylase test appeared as the most relevant assay, since all EIEC strains were negative for this enzyme, whereas 66.7% of non-EIEC strains were positive. Other helpful tests performed for strain characterization were: gas production from glucose and from glycerol, sucrose and salicin fermentation, and esculin hydrolysis (p < 0.01). However, strains behaviour was variable with these tests. Differences between both groups of strains with regard to mucate utilization and dulcitol fermentation was significative only to a 5% level. Antibiotic sensitivity patterns showed differences between EIEC and non-EIEC strains: 37.5% of the former vs 80% of the latter, were resistant to at least four of the antibiotics tested.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Facebook sayfamıza katılın

Bilim tarafından desteklenen en eksiksiz şifalı otlar veritabanı

  • 55 dilde çalışır
  • Bilim destekli bitkisel kürler
  • Görüntüye göre bitki tanıma
  • Etkileşimli GPS haritası - bölgedeki bitkileri etiketleyin (yakında)
  • Aramanızla ilgili bilimsel yayınları okuyun
  • Şifalı bitkileri etkilerine göre arayın
  • İlgi alanlarınızı düzenleyin ve haber araştırmaları, klinik denemeler ve patentlerle güncel kalın

Bir belirti veya hastalık yazın ve yardımcı olabilecek bitkiler hakkında bilgi edinin, bir bitki yazın ve karşı kullanıldığı hastalıkları ve semptomları görün.
* Tüm bilgiler yayınlanmış bilimsel araştırmalara dayanmaktadır

Google Play badgeApp Store badge