Turkish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1990-Jul

Differential effects of estrogen and antiestrogen on in vitro clonogenic growth of human breast cancers in soft agar.

Sadece kayıtlı kullanıcılar makaleleri çevirebilir
Giriş yapmak kayıt olmak
Bağlantı panoya kaydedilir
Y Nomura
H Tashiro
K Hisamatsu

Anahtar kelimeler

Öz

Of 534 human primary breast cancers provided for clonogenic assay in vitro, 276 (51.7%) developed distinctive colony formation by the soft-agar method. Estrogen receptors (ERs) were assayed by dextran-coated charcoal methods. A total of 65 (23.7%) of 274 breast cancers responded to added 10 nM 17 beta-estradiol (E2) by an increase in the number of colonies per dish of 150% or more of that in the controls treated with dextran-coated charcoal. The ER-positive and ER-negative tumors differed significantly in their response to E2: 55 (29.9%) of 184 ER-positive tumors responded versus 10 (11.1%) of 90 ER-negative tumors. The cancers in which the number of colonies increased to 150% or more of that of the controls were considered to be estrogen dependent; those in which the number of colonies increased to less than 150% of the control values were considered to be estrogen independent. When 1 microM tamoxifen (TMX) was added to the medium, 48 (21.3%) of 225 cancers showed a decreased in the number of colonies to 50% or less of that of the controls. Thus, we could separate breast cancers that were TMX sensitive (No. of colonies less than or equal to 50% of that of controls) from those that were TMX resistant (No. of colonies greater than 50% of that of controls). The response to TMX of the ER-positive cancers was significantly higher than that of the ER-negative tumors: 39 (25.5%) of 153 ER-positive tumors responded versus nine (12.5%) of 72 ER-negative tumors. In 153 ER-positive and 71 ER-negative tumors, we evaluated the correlation between the response to E2 and the response to TMX. ER-positive and ER-negative tumors differed significantly in their sensitivities to the two drugs. The TMX sensitivity did not completely correlate with the E2 dependence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Facebook sayfamıza katılın

Bilim tarafından desteklenen en eksiksiz şifalı otlar veritabanı

  • 55 dilde çalışır
  • Bilim destekli bitkisel kürler
  • Görüntüye göre bitki tanıma
  • Etkileşimli GPS haritası - bölgedeki bitkileri etiketleyin (yakında)
  • Aramanızla ilgili bilimsel yayınları okuyun
  • Şifalı bitkileri etkilerine göre arayın
  • İlgi alanlarınızı düzenleyin ve haber araştırmaları, klinik denemeler ve patentlerle güncel kalın

Bir belirti veya hastalık yazın ve yardımcı olabilecek bitkiler hakkında bilgi edinin, bir bitki yazın ve karşı kullanıldığı hastalıkları ve semptomları görün.
* Tüm bilgiler yayınlanmış bilimsel araştırmalara dayanmaktadır

Google Play badgeApp Store badge