Turkish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Neurosurgery 2012-Jun

Role of fever in ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Sadece kayıtlı kullanıcılar makaleleri çevirebilir
Giriş yapmak kayıt olmak
Bağlantı panoya kaydedilir
Robert M Starke
Ricardo J Komotar
Brian Y Hwang
Fred Rincon
Ivan S Kotchetkov
Stephan A Mayer
E Sander Connolly

Anahtar kelimeler

Öz

BACKGROUND

Central fever is common after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and may delay ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize that drain-dependent aSAH patients with central fever or persistent fever after treatment of an identifiable cause are not at an increased risk of infectious VPS failure.

METHODS

Patient demographics, radiographic characteristics, temperature, incidence of infection, and shunt failure were prospectively recorded in a consecutive cohort of aSAH patients. Central fever was defined as temperature higher than 38.3°C with no identifiable cause.

RESULTS

Of 580 patients, 61 (11%) were drain dependent. Central fever developed in 18, 35 had fever of known etiology, and 8 remained afebrile. There was no shunt failure at discharge, and 2 failures (3.2%) at follow-up were attributed to infection. One patient with central fever (6%), none with fever of identifiable etiology, and 1 (13%) with no fever had infectious shunt failures at a median follow-up of 10.2 ± 3.6 months (P > .05). Nine patients with central fever (50%) and 6 (17%) who were treated for fever of known etiologies had persistent fever at shunt placement. Patients who were febrile on the day of surgery had similar infectious shunt failure rates at discharge compared with those who were afebrile (0% vs 0%; P = 1.0). Similarly, febrile and afebrile patients at VPS insertion had comparable rates of infectious shunt failure at follow-up (7% vs 2%; P = .43).

CONCLUSIONS

aSAH patients with central fever or persistent fever after treatment of fever of identifiable etiology are not at an increased risk of infectious VPS failure.

Facebook sayfamıza katılın

Bilim tarafından desteklenen en eksiksiz şifalı otlar veritabanı

  • 55 dilde çalışır
  • Bilim destekli bitkisel kürler
  • Görüntüye göre bitki tanıma
  • Etkileşimli GPS haritası - bölgedeki bitkileri etiketleyin (yakında)
  • Aramanızla ilgili bilimsel yayınları okuyun
  • Şifalı bitkileri etkilerine göre arayın
  • İlgi alanlarınızı düzenleyin ve haber araştırmaları, klinik denemeler ve patentlerle güncel kalın

Bir belirti veya hastalık yazın ve yardımcı olabilecek bitkiler hakkında bilgi edinin, bir bitki yazın ve karşı kullanıldığı hastalıkları ve semptomları görün.
* Tüm bilgiler yayınlanmış bilimsel araştırmalara dayanmaktadır

Google Play badgeApp Store badge