Turkish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Cancer Causes and Control 1992-Jul

Soft tissue sarcoma and tobacco use: data from a prospective cohort study of United States veterans.

Sadece kayıtlı kullanıcılar makaleleri çevirebilir
Giriş yapmak kayıt olmak
Bağlantı panoya kaydedilir
S H Zahm
E F Heineman
J B Vaught

Anahtar kelimeler

Öz

A report of an increased risk of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) among users of smokeless tobacco led us to evaluate this association and the role of other types of tobacco in a prospective cohort mortality-study of United States veterans. A total of 248,046 veterans provided tobacco-use histories on a mail questionnaire in 1954 or 1957. Data on subsequent tobacco use were not collected. By 1980, 119 deaths from STS had occurred among the cohort members. Veterans who had ever chewed tobacco or used snuff had a nonsignificant 40 percent excess of STS (95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.8-2.6; 21 deaths) in comparison with veterans who had never used any tobacco products. Risk was limited to former users (relative risk [RR] = 1.5) with no excess seen among current users (RR = 0.9). Frequent former users had higher risk (RR = 1.9) than infrequent users (RR = 1.3). Risk was slightly higher in persons who started using smokeless tobacco at younger ages, but did not increase with duration of use or with late age at cessation of use. Most veterans who used chewing tobacco or snuff also used some other form of tobacco. No STS deaths occurred among the 2,308 veterans who used smokeless tobacco only. An unexpected finding of the study was the significant excess of STS deaths among cigarette smokers (RR = 1.8, CI = 1.1-2.9). Risk was higher among ex-smokers (RR = 2.2) than among current smokers (RR = 1.5) and was not related to number of cigarettes per day, age started smoking, duration, or pack-years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Facebook sayfamıza katılın

Bilim tarafından desteklenen en eksiksiz şifalı otlar veritabanı

  • 55 dilde çalışır
  • Bilim destekli bitkisel kürler
  • Görüntüye göre bitki tanıma
  • Etkileşimli GPS haritası - bölgedeki bitkileri etiketleyin (yakında)
  • Aramanızla ilgili bilimsel yayınları okuyun
  • Şifalı bitkileri etkilerine göre arayın
  • İlgi alanlarınızı düzenleyin ve haber araştırmaları, klinik denemeler ve patentlerle güncel kalın

Bir belirti veya hastalık yazın ve yardımcı olabilecek bitkiler hakkında bilgi edinin, bir bitki yazın ve karşı kullanıldığı hastalıkları ve semptomları görün.
* Tüm bilgiler yayınlanmış bilimsel araştırmalara dayanmaktadır

Google Play badgeApp Store badge