Turkish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Spine 2016-May

Targeted Therapy for Low Back Pain in Elderly Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis: A Cohort Study.

Sadece kayıtlı kullanıcılar makaleleri çevirebilir
Giriş yapmak kayıt olmak
Bağlantı panoya kaydedilir
Kiyotaka Yamada
Toshio Nakamae
Takuro Shimbo
Toshikatsu Kanazawa
Teruaki Okuda
Haruhiko Takata
Takashi Hashimoto
Takeshi Hiramatsu
Nobuhiro Tanaka
Kjell Olmarker

Anahtar kelimeler

Öz

METHODS

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the novel treatment procedure with nonoperative treatment for low back pain (LBP) in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).

BACKGROUND

Treatment of LBP associated with elderly DLS is controversial. We developed a novel treatment procedure, termed percutaneous intervertebral-vacuum polymethylmethacrylate injection (PIPI).

METHODS

We included patients with de novo DLS aged ≥65 years who had LBP with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of >50 for ≥6 months with intervertebral vacuum and vertebral bone marrow edema (BME) defined on fat-saturated T2-weighted or gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. The primary outcomes were evaluated using the VAS score and modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). As an objective measurement, we scored BME on magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Between August 2004 and July 2011, 109 patients underwent PIPI and 53 received nonoperative treatment. At 1 month, mean improvements in VAS scores were -55.3 (95% CI, -60.5 to -50.1) and -1.9 (CI, -7.7 to 3.8) and mean improvements in ODI were -22.7 (CI, -27.3 to -18.2) and -0.6 (CI, -6.6 to 5.4) for the PIPI and nonoperative groups, respectively. At 2 years, mean improvements in VAS scores were -52.2 (CI, -59.9 to -44.4) and -4.0 (CI, -10.9 to 3.0) and mean improvements in ODI were -20.7 (CI, -27.3 to -14.5) and -1.0 (CI, -7.7 to 5.7) for the PIPI and nonoperative groups, respectively. BME substantially decreased in the PIPI group compared with the nonoperative group (P <0.001) and correlated with VAS score and ODI improvements (VAS score: r = 0.502, P <0.001; ODI: r = 0.372, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PIPI improved treatment for LBP, with a sustained clinical benefit for at least 2 years.

METHODS

3.

Facebook sayfamıza katılın

Bilim tarafından desteklenen en eksiksiz şifalı otlar veritabanı

  • 55 dilde çalışır
  • Bilim destekli bitkisel kürler
  • Görüntüye göre bitki tanıma
  • Etkileşimli GPS haritası - bölgedeki bitkileri etiketleyin (yakında)
  • Aramanızla ilgili bilimsel yayınları okuyun
  • Şifalı bitkileri etkilerine göre arayın
  • İlgi alanlarınızı düzenleyin ve haber araştırmaları, klinik denemeler ve patentlerle güncel kalın

Bir belirti veya hastalık yazın ve yardımcı olabilecek bitkiler hakkında bilgi edinin, bir bitki yazın ve karşı kullanıldığı hastalıkları ve semptomları görün.
* Tüm bilgiler yayınlanmış bilimsel araştırmalara dayanmaktadır

Google Play badgeApp Store badge