Turkish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Kathmandu University Medical Journal

Validation of the proposed clinical diagnostic criteria of enteric fever.

Sadece kayıtlı kullanıcılar makaleleri çevirebilir
Giriş yapmak kayıt olmak
Bağlantı panoya kaydedilir
A Neopane
S Panta

Anahtar kelimeler

Öz

BACKGROUND

Enteric fever is very common infectious disease in developing countries like Nepal. Due to lack of resources diagnosis has to be clinical most of the time. Hence a proposal of clinical diagnostic criteria and validation of the same would be very useful.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the proposed clinical diagnostic criterion including features characterized as major and minor criteria.

METHODS

This study was done in the department of medicine of Kathmandu Medical College Teaching hospital, from June 2009 to January 2012. A total of 114 patients presenting with fever were included in the study. After proposal of clinical diagnostic criteria for enteric fever, by a prior published study, all the fever patients were grouped according to criteria positive or negative. The most significant criteria were validated by calculating sensitivity and specificity along with positive and negative likelihood ratios with blood culture taken as gold standard.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were enrolled. Total patients diagnosed as enteric was 47.3 %. Clinical diagnostic criterion B which included three major (headache, fever and relative bradycardia) and three minor criteria (abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, splenomegaly and chills) was highly significant (p=<.0001) in diagnosing enteric fever and had a sensitivity of 72.2% ( 95% CI 58.1- 83.1) and specificity of 98.3% ( 95% CI 89.8-99-9). The positive likelihood ratio was 43.33 (95 % CI 6.16-304.77) and negative likelihood ratio as 0.28 (95% CI 0.18-0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical diagnostic criteria can be a very useful tool for diagnosis of enteric fever when culture facility is not available.

Facebook sayfamıza katılın

Bilim tarafından desteklenen en eksiksiz şifalı otlar veritabanı

  • 55 dilde çalışır
  • Bilim destekli bitkisel kürler
  • Görüntüye göre bitki tanıma
  • Etkileşimli GPS haritası - bölgedeki bitkileri etiketleyin (yakında)
  • Aramanızla ilgili bilimsel yayınları okuyun
  • Şifalı bitkileri etkilerine göre arayın
  • İlgi alanlarınızı düzenleyin ve haber araştırmaları, klinik denemeler ve patentlerle güncel kalın

Bir belirti veya hastalık yazın ve yardımcı olabilecek bitkiler hakkında bilgi edinin, bir bitki yazın ve karşı kullanıldığı hastalıkları ve semptomları görün.
* Tüm bilgiler yayınlanmış bilimsel araştırmalara dayanmaktadır

Google Play badgeApp Store badge