Turkish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
European Journal of Pharmacology 2020-Aug

Microstructure analysis of the effects of the cannabinoid agents HU-210 and rimonabant in rats licking for sucrose

Sadece kayıtlı kullanıcılar makaleleri çevirebilir
Giriş yapmak kayıt olmak
Bağlantı panoya kaydedilir
Paolo D'Aquila

Anahtar kelimeler

Öz

Stimulation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors generally increases ingestion. However, the non-selective cannabinoid receptor agonist HU-210 exerts the opposite effect. The first objective of this study was to investigate the role of CB1 receptors in this "atypical" effect. Studies on the endocannabinoid system investigating the microstructure of licking for palatable solutions reported inconsistent results as for the role of CB1 receptors in "liking" and "wanting". The second objective was to deal with these inconsistencies investigating the within-session time-course of licking-burst number. The microstructure of licking for a 10% sucrose solution in 30-min sessions was analysed in two experiments. In Experiment 1, the effect of the CB1 receptor antagonist-inverse agonist rimonabant (0.5, 1 mg/kg) on HU-210 effect (100 μg/kg) was investigated. A dose range of HU-210 (25, 50, 100 μg/kg) was examined in Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, both HU-210 and rimonabant reduced licking due to reduced burst number. Moreover, HU-210 reduced the intra-burst lick rate, an index of motor competence. HU-210 effects were antagonised by rimonabant, and vice versa. Rimonabant decreased burst number late in the session at 0.5 mg/kg, and since the beginning of the session at 1 mg/kg. In Experiment 2, HU-210 failed to affect overall ingestion. These results suggest that HU-210 effect - when present - depends on CB1 receptor stimulation, possibly leading to impairment of the motor competence necessary for licking. The reduction of burst number late in the session observed with rimonabant 0.5 mg/kg, which resembles the effect of reward devaluation, might suggest reduced "liking".

Keywords: Behavioural activation; HU-210; Licking microstructure; Reward; Reward-evaluation; Rimonabant.

Facebook sayfamıza katılın

Bilim tarafından desteklenen en eksiksiz şifalı otlar veritabanı

  • 55 dilde çalışır
  • Bilim destekli bitkisel kürler
  • Görüntüye göre bitki tanıma
  • Etkileşimli GPS haritası - bölgedeki bitkileri etiketleyin (yakında)
  • Aramanızla ilgili bilimsel yayınları okuyun
  • Şifalı bitkileri etkilerine göre arayın
  • İlgi alanlarınızı düzenleyin ve haber araştırmaları, klinik denemeler ve patentlerle güncel kalın

Bir belirti veya hastalık yazın ve yardımcı olabilecek bitkiler hakkında bilgi edinin, bir bitki yazın ve karşı kullanıldığı hastalıkları ve semptomları görün.
* Tüm bilgiler yayınlanmış bilimsel araştırmalara dayanmaktadır

Google Play badgeApp Store badge