Vietnamese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Plant Disease 2004-Apr

First Report of Alternaria Species Groups Involved in Disease Complexes of Hazelnut and Walnut Fruit.

Chỉ người dùng đã đăng ký mới có thể dịch các bài báo
Đăng nhập Đăng ký
Liên kết được lưu vào khay nhớ tạm
A Belisario
M Maccaroni
A Coramusi
L Corazza
B Pryor
P Figuli

Từ khóa

trừu tượng

During the last 5 years, two new diseases, brown apical necrosis (BAN) and gray necrosis (GN), were observed on English walnut (Juglans regia) and hazelnut (Corylus avellana), respectively (2,3). Both diseases caused severe fruit drop resulting in yield loss often exceeding 30%. Previous work demonstrated that BAN and GN are disease complexes caused by several fungi (Alternaria spp., Fusarium spp., and a Phomopsis sp.) (2,3). In both diseases, preliminary identification of Alternaria spp. revealed they were a complex of small-spored catenulate taxa related to A. alternata. To further characterize these taxa, additional pathogenicity tests and morphological examinations were conducted with isolates obtained from each host. Single-spored isolates were prescreened for pathogenicity by inoculating detached, surface-disinfested hazelnut leaves or walnut leaflets (1). Only isolates that produced foliar lesions after 5 days were used in subsequent fruit inoculations. From this screening, 35 isolates were selected (19 from walnut and 16 from hazelnut). For each isolate, attached fruit of respective hosts were inoculated at bloom by placing 10 μl of a conidial suspension (1 × 106 conidia per ml of H2O + 0.26% agar) onto the stigmas (150 fruit per isolate). Controls (150 fruit) were treated with agar solution only. After 15 days, fruit were examined for development of disease symptoms, and examination continued until fruit maturation (late July). Approximately 20 to 50% of the inoculated fruit displayed discoloration or necrosis of internal tissue, particularly the pericarp and the embryo, although symptoms were more limited than those typically seen in fully expressed BAN and GN. No differences in symptoms were evident among the isolates tested. The controls showed no symptom development initially, although 5% began to develop discoloration at fruit maturity. Fungal isolates used as inoculum were reisolated from all symptomatic fruit by surface disinfesting tissue from the margins of necrotic lesions. For each isolate, the conidial characteristics were described from cultures grown under defined conditions (4). Three distinct groups of isolates were identified. Alternata sp. group isolates produced conidial chains (8 to 20 spores) with numerous secondary and occasionally tertiary chains branching from apical and median cells. Conidia were typically ovate and often possessed a one-celled apical extension. Tenuissima sp. group isolates developed conidial chains (10 to 22 spores) with occasional branching forming secondary chains from apical and median cells. Conidia were ovate to obclavate, often with long apical extensions (10 to 35 μm). Arborescens sp. group isolates developed conidial chains (5 to 12 spores) with numerous secondary, tertiary, and quaternary short chains branching from apical cells. Conidia were typically ovate with minimal apical extensions. Of the walnut isolates, 12, 4, and 3 were from the arborescens, alternata, and tenuissima sp. groups, respectively. Of the hazelnut isolates, 7, 6, and 3 were from the arborescens, alternata, and tenuissima sp. groups, respectively. The finding that Alternaria from several distinct sp. groups can cause similar disease on a single host is consistent with previous work on pistachio, almond, and pear (4). References: (1) A. Belisario et al. Plant Dis. 83:696, 1999. (2) A. Belisario et al. Plant Dis. 86:599, 2002. (3) A. Belisario et al. Inf. Agrario 59:71, 2003. (4) B. M. Pryor et al. Phytopathology 92:406, 2002.

Tham gia trang
facebook của chúng tôi

Cơ sở dữ liệu đầy đủ nhất về dược liệu được hỗ trợ bởi khoa học

  • Hoạt động bằng 55 ngôn ngữ
  • Phương pháp chữa bệnh bằng thảo dược được hỗ trợ bởi khoa học
  • Nhận dạng các loại thảo mộc bằng hình ảnh
  • Bản đồ GPS tương tác - gắn thẻ các loại thảo mộc vào vị trí (sắp ra mắt)
  • Đọc các ấn phẩm khoa học liên quan đến tìm kiếm của bạn
  • Tìm kiếm dược liệu theo tác dụng của chúng
  • Sắp xếp sở thích của bạn và cập nhật các nghiên cứu tin tức, thử nghiệm lâm sàng và bằng sáng chế

Nhập một triệu chứng hoặc một căn bệnh và đọc về các loại thảo mộc có thể hữu ích, nhập một loại thảo mộc và xem các bệnh và triệu chứng mà nó được sử dụng để chống lại.
* Tất cả thông tin dựa trên nghiên cứu khoa học đã được công bố

Google Play badgeApp Store badge