Vietnamese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017-07

Oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for cancer pain in adults.

Chỉ người dùng đã đăng ký mới có thể dịch các bài báo
Đăng nhập Đăng ký
Liên kết được lưu vào khay nhớ tạm
Sheena Derry
Philip J Wiffen
R Andrew Moore
Ewan D McNicol
Rae F Bell
Daniel B Carr
Mairead McIntyre
Bee Wee

Từ khóa

trừu tượng

Pain is a common symptom with cancer, and 30% to 50% of all people with cancer will experience moderate to severe pain that can have a major negative impact on their quality of life. Non-opioid drugs are commonly used to treat cancer pain, and are recommended for this purpose in the World Health Organization (WHO) cancer pain treatment ladder, either alone or in combination with opioids.A previous Cochrane review that examined the evidence for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or paracetamol, alone or combined with opioids, for cancer pain was withdrawn in 2015 because it was out of date; the date of the last search was 2005. This review, and another on paracetamol, updates the evidence.

To assess the efficacy of oral NSAIDs for cancer pain in adults, and the adverse events reported during their use in clinical trials.

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase from inception to April 2017, together with reference lists of retrieved papers and reviews, and two online study registries.

We included randomised, double-blind, single-blind, or open-label studies of five days' duration or longer, comparing any oral NSAID alone with placebo or another NSAID, or a combination of NSAID plus opioid with the same dose of the opioid alone, for cancer pain of any pain intensity. The minimum study size was 25 participants per treatment arm at the initial randomisation.

Two review authors independently searched for studies, extracted efficacy and adverse event data, and examined issues of study quality and potential bias. We did not carry out any pooled analyses. We assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table.

Eleven studies satisfied inclusion criteria, lasting one week or longer; 949 participants with mostly moderate or severe pain were randomised initially, but fewer completed treatment or had results of treatment. Eight studies were double-blind, two single-blind, and one open-label. None had a placebo only control; eight compared different NSAIDs, three an NSAID with opioid or opioid combination, and one both. None compared an NSAID plus opioid with the same dose of opioid alone. Most studies were at high risk of bias for blinding, incomplete outcome data, or small size; none was unequivocally at low risk of bias.It was not possible to compare NSAIDs as a group with another treatment, or one NSAID with another NSAID. Results for all NSAIDs are reported as a randomised cohort. We judged results for all outcomes as very low-quality evidence.None of the studies reported our primary outcomes of participants with pain reduction of at least 50%, and at least 30%, from baseline; participants with Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of much improved or very much improved (or equivalent wording). With NSAID, initially moderate or severe pain was reduced to no worse than mild pain after one or two weeks in four studies (415 participants in total), with a range of estimates between 26% and 51% in individual studies.Adverse event and withdrawal reporting was inconsistent. Two serious adverse events were reported with NSAIDs, and 22 deaths, but these were not clearly related to any pain treatment. Common adverse events were thirst/dry mouth (15%), loss of appetite (14%), somnolence (11%), and dyspepsia (11%). Withdrawals were common, mostly because of lack of efficacy (24%) or adverse events (5%).

There is no high-quality evidence to support or refute the use of NSAIDs alone or in combination with opioids for the three steps of the three-step WHO cancer pain ladder. There is very low-quality evidence that some people with moderate or severe cancer pain can obtain substantial levels of benefit within one or two weeks.

Tham gia trang
facebook của chúng tôi

Cơ sở dữ liệu đầy đủ nhất về dược liệu được hỗ trợ bởi khoa học

  • Hoạt động bằng 55 ngôn ngữ
  • Phương pháp chữa bệnh bằng thảo dược được hỗ trợ bởi khoa học
  • Nhận dạng các loại thảo mộc bằng hình ảnh
  • Bản đồ GPS tương tác - gắn thẻ các loại thảo mộc vào vị trí (sắp ra mắt)
  • Đọc các ấn phẩm khoa học liên quan đến tìm kiếm của bạn
  • Tìm kiếm dược liệu theo tác dụng của chúng
  • Sắp xếp sở thích của bạn và cập nhật các nghiên cứu tin tức, thử nghiệm lâm sàng và bằng sáng chế

Nhập một triệu chứng hoặc một căn bệnh và đọc về các loại thảo mộc có thể hữu ích, nhập một loại thảo mộc và xem các bệnh và triệu chứng mà nó được sử dụng để chống lại.
* Tất cả thông tin dựa trên nghiên cứu khoa học đã được công bố

Google Play badgeApp Store badge