中文(繁體)
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Medicinski Glasnik 2011-Feb

[Antibacterial effect of the materials for the root canal filling, bases and material for the cavity fillings].

只有註冊用戶可以翻譯文章
登陸註冊
鏈接已保存到剪貼板
Suzana Ferk
Paris Simeon
Goranka Prpić Mehicić
Smilja Kalenić
Ivica Anić
Silvana Jukić

關鍵詞

抽象

OBJECTIVE

To assess antimicrobial effects of the materials used in the endodontic treatment of the teeth.

METHODS

The following root-canal fillings were examined: Ketac Endo, AH Plus, Diaket, and gutta-percha, by means of the agar diffusion test. As for the base materials, Zink Oxide/Eugenol cement, glass-ionomere cements Fuji II LC Improved, Ketac Cem, and phosphate cement and Harvard cement were investigated. Finally, of the materials for final cavity filling, amalgam, Ketac Molar and Fuji II LC Improved were tested. In the present research, the following bacteria were applied: Streptococcus mutans, Streptotoccus mitis, Lactobacillus species, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcusfaecalis, and polymicrobial suspention. For each individual bacterium tested, material samples were placed on the inoculated plates of blood-agar.

RESULTS

Antibacterial effects were confirmed in the following materials: root-canal fillings--Diaket, AH Plus, Ketac Endo; bases--Zink Oxide/Eugenol cement, phosphat cement and Harvard cement. No antibacterial effect was established in: amalgam, gutta-percha, Fuji II LC Improved, Ketac Cem and Ketac Molar. Diaket showed a statistically more significant antibacterial effect in comparison with AH Plus, Ketac Endo, and gutta-percha (P(s.mitis) < 0.05; P(s.mutans) < 0.05; p(lactobacillus) < 0.05; p(enterococcus) < 0.05; P(staphilococcus) < 0.05; p(polymicrobial) < 0.05); of the base materials, however, a somewhat stronger antimicrobial effect was found in phosphate cement, Harvard cement, and Zink Oxide/Eugenol (ZnOE) (p < 0.05) as compared with Fuji II LC Improved and Ketac Cem.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of this study, and considering the fact that all cavity-filling materials failed to show any antimicrobial effect at all, when choosing the materials for root-canal fillings, and for bases, advantage should be given to those with the manifested strongest antibacterial effect, namely Diaket and phosphate cement.

加入我們的臉書專頁

科學支持的最完整的草藥數據庫

  • 支持55種語言
  • 科學支持的草藥療法
  • 通過圖像識別草藥
  • 交互式GPS地圖-在位置標記草藥(即將推出)
  • 閱讀與您的搜索相關的科學出版物
  • 通過藥效搜索藥草
  • 組織您的興趣並及時了解新聞研究,臨床試驗和專利

輸入症狀或疾病,並閱讀可能有用的草藥,輸入草藥並查看其所針對的疾病和症狀。
*所有信息均基於已發表的科學研究

Google Play badgeApp Store badge