Hindi
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Ophthalmology 2015-Nov

Outcome of Treatment of Uveitic Macular Edema: The Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial 2-Year Results.

केवल पंजीकृत उपयोगकर्ता ही लेखों का अनुवाद कर सकते हैं
साइन अप करने के लिए लॉग इन करें
लिंक क्लिपबोर्ड पर सहेजा गया है
Oren Tomkins-Netzer
Susan Lightman
Lea Drye
John Kempen
Gary N Holland
Narsing A Rao
Richard J Stawell
Albert Vitale
Douglas A Jabs
Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial Research Group

कीवर्ड

सार

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 2-year outcomes of uveitic macular edema.

METHODS

Longitudinal follow-up of a randomized cohort.

METHODS

At baseline, 148 eyes of 117 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial had macular edema, and 134 eyes of 108 patients completed 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the study were randomized to either systemic immunosuppression or intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant therapy. Macular edema was defined as thickening of the retina (center point thickness≥240 μm) on time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) of macula.

METHODS

Improvement in macular edema (≥20% reduction in central point thickness on OCT), resolution of macular edema (normalization of thickness on OCT), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

RESULTS

Between randomization and 2-years' follow-up, 62% and 25% of eyes in the systemic and implant groups, respectively, received at least 1 supplemental regional corticosteroid injection. By 2-years' follow-up, macular edema improved in 71% of eyes and resolved in 60%. There were no differences between treatment groups in the proportion of eyes with macular edema improving (systemic therapy vs. implant, 65% vs. 77%; P=0.20) and resolving (52% vs. 68%; P=0.28), but eyes randomized to implant had more improvement in macular thickness (median decrease of 180 vs. 109 μm in the systemic therapy group; P=0.04). Eyes with baseline fluorescein angiographic leakage were more likely to improve than those without (76% vs. 58%; P=0.03). Overall, there was a mean 5-letter (1 line) improvement in BCVA at 2 years. Mean changes in BCVA from baseline at 2 years by macular edema response status were: resolution, +10 letters; improvement without resolution, +10 letters (P=0.92); little to no change, 6 letters (P=0.19); and worsening, -16 letters (worsening acuity; P=0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

About two thirds of eyes with uveitic macular edema were observed to experience improvement in the edema and visual acuity with implant or systemic treatment. Fluocinolone acetonide implant therapy was associated with a greater quantitative improvement in thickness. Fluorescein angiography leakage was associated with a greater likelihood of improvement in macular edema.

हमारे फेसबुक पेज से जुड़ें

विज्ञान द्वारा समर्थित सबसे पूर्ण औषधीय जड़ी बूटी डेटाबेस

  • 55 भाषाओं में काम करता है
  • विज्ञान द्वारा समर्थित हर्बल इलाज
  • छवि द्वारा जड़ी बूटी की मान्यता
  • इंटरएक्टिव जीपीएस नक्शा - स्थान पर टैग जड़ी बूटियों (जल्द ही आ रहा है)
  • अपनी खोज से संबंधित वैज्ञानिक प्रकाशन पढ़ें
  • उनके प्रभाव से औषधीय जड़ी बूटियों की खोज करें
  • अपने हितों को व्यवस्थित करें और समाचार अनुसंधान, नैदानिक परीक्षणों और पेटेंट के साथ अद्यतित रहें

एक लक्षण या बीमारी टाइप करें और जड़ी-बूटियों के बारे में पढ़ें जो मदद कर सकती हैं, एक जड़ी बूटी टाइप करें और बीमारियों और लक्षणों को देखें जिनके खिलाफ इसका उपयोग किया जाता है।
* सभी जानकारी प्रकाशित वैज्ञानिक शोध पर आधारित है

Google Play badgeApp Store badge