Swahili
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
International Journal of Urology 2006-Aug

Midline extraperitoneal approach to upper urinary tract surgery: anatomical basis of surgical technique.

Watumiaji waliosajiliwa tu ndio wanaweza kutafsiri nakala
Ingia / Ingia
Kiungo kimehifadhiwa kwenye clipboard
Seiichi Orikasa
Koichi Kanbe
Shuichi Shirai
Naomasa Iorotani
Masataka Aizawa
Akira Takeuchi
Shinichi Yamashita

Maneno muhimu

Kikemikali

OBJECTIVE

To overcome the disadvantages inherent in the standard surgical approach to the kidney, we introduced a novel surgical technique via a midline extraperitoneal approach. The surgical technique is not substantially different from that of the standard midline transperitoneal approach, except no entry is made into the peritoneal cavity. Although the peritoneum itself is extremely thin and fragile, the peritoneum together with underlying subperitoneal fascia can be dissected readily as a substantial layer, if the proper plane is dissected. Further medial mobilization of the peritoneal sac en bloc by pursuing the fusion fascia plane allows full exposure of the kidney, ureter and great vessels. This approach was adopted for consecutive 51 patients during a 10-month period in 2003. All operations, including 33 radical nephrectomies and 11 nephroureterectomies were completed successfully without significant technical difficulties and differences in operation time and estimated blood loss compared to the transperitoneal approach. No intra- or perioperative complication occurred. All patients did seem to have a much more comfortable postoperative period with minor pain and few abdominal complaint, and the clinical impression was that they resumed the physical activity and oral intake earlier than those after the transperitoneal approach (P = 0.056). There are no operation-related problems such as intra-abdominal adhesion or abdominal muscle weakness resulting in some deformity at 2-year or more follow up. This approach combines the advantages of the transperitoneal midline and extraperitoneal flank approach. Its use will undoubtedly reduce the complications inherent in the transperitoneal approach or the flank approach.

Jiunge na ukurasa
wetu wa facebook

Hifadhidata kamili ya mimea ya dawa inayoungwa mkono na sayansi

  • Inafanya kazi katika lugha 55
  • Uponyaji wa mitishamba unaungwa mkono na sayansi
  • Kutambua mimea kwa picha
  • Ramani ya GPS inayoshirikiana
  • Soma machapisho ya kisayansi yanayohusiana na utafutaji wako
  • Tafuta mimea ya dawa na athari zao
  • Panga maslahi yako na fanya tarehe ya utafiti wa habari, majaribio ya kliniki na ruhusu

Andika dalili au ugonjwa na usome juu ya mimea ambayo inaweza kusaidia, chapa mimea na uone magonjwa na dalili ambazo hutumiwa dhidi yake.
* Habari zote zinategemea utafiti wa kisayansi uliochapishwa

Google Play badgeApp Store badge