Japanese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Pathologie 1995

[Prognostic factors in liver tumors].

登録ユーザーのみが記事を翻訳できます
ログインサインアップ
リンクがクリップボードに保存されます
C Wittekind

キーワード

概要

The prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma is dismal. Long-term survival and cure of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be expected only after resection or hepatectomy followed by transplantation. Thus, prognosis primarily depends on the possibility of resective surgery, which is determined predominantly by anatomic extent of disease. This survey deals with factors that become effective after resection or transplantation and that have prognostic significance in univariate or multivariate analyses. Several studies have shown that resection for cure (R classification) and anatomical extent of the tumors (TNM) were the most important prognostic factors. Prognostic factors other than TNM and R can be grouped into clinical findings and pathological features. As to clinical findings, performance status is an important prognostic factor in one multivariate analysis. The effects of other factors as age, sex, tumor site, and hepatomegaly on prognosis were discussed controversially. As might be expected, studies on pathological factors yielded different results. Histological grade had an influence in one study, but not in another. Histological type and coexisting cirrhosis were important in multivariate analysis only in resected patients. The majority of factors (capsule formation, dysplasia of adjacent liver tissue, mitotic activity, bile production) were only investigated in univariate analyses. There are only few studies evaluating the prognostic importance of molecular pathology factors. None of them has shown convincing evidence that these parameters may give information more important than TNM and R classification. The prognostic importance of TNM for patients not treated by resective surgery is emphasized in many studies. Ascites, toxic syndrome, and laboratory variables as bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, and serum albumin were independent predictors of survival. The prognosis of patients with cholangiocarcinoma is even worse than that of HCC-patients and only 25% patients resected with stage-II-tumors can be expected to survive for five years.

Facebookページに参加する

科学に裏打ちされた最も完全な薬草データベース

  • 55の言語で動作します
  • 科学に裏打ちされたハーブ療法
  • 画像によるハーブの認識
  • インタラクティブGPSマップ-場所にハーブをタグ付け(近日公開)
  • 検索に関連する科学出版物を読む
  • それらの効果によって薬草を検索する
  • あなたの興味を整理し、ニュース研究、臨床試験、特許について最新情報を入手してください

症状や病気を入力し、役立つ可能性のあるハーブについて読み、ハーブを入力して、それが使用されている病気や症状を確認します。
*すべての情報は公開された科学的研究に基づいています

Google Play badgeApp Store badge